OUR LAWSUITS
HUMAN FREE WILL v. RCN & SERVICE ELECTRIC (2022)
[TO GET OFF PRIVATE NETWORK FOR ATTACKS]
ALL FORMS OF COMMUNICATIONS GET BLOCKED OR REROUTED
PRIVATE NETWORK IS A MAN IN THE MIDDLE KEEPING IN DETENTION
HUMAN FREE WILL v. JOHN DOE AGENCY et al (2022)
[INVESTIGATION INTO CONSTANT COVERT ATTACKS]
WE HAVE NEVER RECEIVED ANY OFFICIAL NOTICES IN THE MAIL
WE HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO ACCESS THE ONLINE PORTAL
Military Commission Act of 2006
Official US policy of torture and the suspension of due process for anyone the president deems to be a terrorist or supporter.
This act is the overt denial of the rights of human beings propagated in our Declaration of Independence and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK BUT HERE IS EVERY CONCLUSION
Court will GRANT defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
The Court will ORDER judgment in favor of defendants
"There exists in our nation today a powerful and dangerous secret cult."
SURVEILLANCE
TARGETED JUSTICE v. GARLAND et al (2023)
[TO GET OFF TERRORIST WATCHLIST AND STOP COVERT ATTACKS]
the existence of a malicious government surveillance and security program of experimentation and persecution inflicted grave physical and psychological injury for being on terrorist watchlist
LIU v. NYS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al (2017)
[FALSE ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT AFTER IMPLANT]
an example of a victim trying to get help in removing a non consenting tracking implant
STATE OF MARYLAND v. ANDREWS (2016)
[WARRANTLESS SURVEILLANCE USING CELL SITE SIMULATOR]
first case in the country where an appellate court held that the use of the device without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unlawful searches and seizures
JEWEL v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al (2011)
[WARRANTLESS MASS SURVEILLANCE USING NETWORK PROVIDERS]
largest known case with the outcome eventually making warrantless mass surveillance legal
RENDITIONS
JAMES MADISON PROJECT v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (2023)
[FOIA SEEKING INFORMATION ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO HAVANA SYNDROME]
JAMES MADISON PROJECT v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al (2020)
[FOIA SEEKING INFORMATION ON THE INVESTIGATION INTO COVERT OFFICER]
CATERBONE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
[WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES LED TO EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION]
EL-MASRI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2007)
[EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION INVOLVING DETENTION AND INTERROGATIONS]
COVERT ACTION
STARRETT v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION et al (2018)
[EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION INVOLVING DETENTION AND INTERROGATIONS]
The Supreme Court denied to hear the case. Everything was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
SOSBEE v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (2001)
[COVERT ACTIONS ON FBI AGENT AND ARMY VETERAN WHISTLEBLOWER]
Pattern of targets of covert action getting denied rights and benefits
JONES v FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS et al (1994)
[FOIA SEEKING COINTELPRO INFORMATION ON BLACK NATIONALIST GROUP]
After 20 years the District Court entered an order granting summary judgment to the FBI to withhold the requested documents
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY v SIMS (1985)
[FOIA SEEKING MKULTRA INFORMATION ON RESEARCHERS AND INSTITUTIONS]
The Supreme Court held that institutions and individuals who performed research on a project financed by the CIA were “intelligence sources” authorized to have their identities withheld
COVERT ACTION
If "leaders" are only good at the ISR Cycle and Information Operations to cover it up, what happens to society as a whole? The answer today is to do more ISR Cycle and Information Operations so NO ONE knows.
Subscribe to the Newsletter
We are approaching an inflection point in Human History. Get the latest insights. From business to the quantum details. We try to explain the "effects". Hopefully the truth gets communicated.